One of the core tenets of behavioral economics that my view utilizes is the idea that human decisions are not always perfectly rational but are often influenced by cognitive biases, social norms, and emotional responses . This perspective is vital when considering the public's willingness to embrace novel transport solutions like electric vehicles (EVs) and autonomous vehicles (AVs) . For instance, despite the environmental benefits of EVs, consumer acceptance can be hindered by range anxiety (a cognitive bias related to perceived risk) or the initial higher purchase cost, even if long-term savings are substantial . Similarly, the adoption of AVs faces challenges related to trust, safety concerns, and the psychological comfort of relinquishing control to a machine .
My opinion also delves into how economic conditions directly influence public transport usage patterns and consumer preferences]. Behavioral economic theories, such as prospect theory, which describes how individuals make decisions under risk and uncertainty, can explain why people might be hesitant to switch from private vehicles to public transport, even when it is more cost-effective or environmentally friendly . The perceived inconvenience, lack of flexibility, or social stigma associated with public transport can outweigh the economic benefits for some individuals
Sorry we are currently not available in your region. Alternatively you can purchase from our partners
Write your review for this book (optional)
Review Deleted
Your review has been deleted and won’t appear on the book anymore.Sorry we are currently not available in your region. Alternatively you can purchase from our partners
John Lok
I had graduated business Administration Science Degree in Common Wealth Open University.
Furthermore, my analysis extends to the role of technology in enhancing passenger satisfaction and its subsequent impact on the development of future transport tools . My view raises the question of whether technology can sufficiently raise passenger satisfaction to drive economic growth in the transport sector .This aligns with behavioral economics' focus on subjective well-being and how non-monetary factors, such as comfort, convenience, and perceived control, contribute to overall satisfaction and influence choices .For example, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into trains, trams, and ferries, as speculated by my opinion, could improve efficiency and safety, potentially increasing public acceptance and usage . However, the success of such integrations hinges on addressing behavioral aspects like trust in AI systems and ensuring a seamless user experience .
In essence, my view argues that a comprehensive understanding of human behavior, including psychological biases and economic motivations, is indispensable for predicting and shaping the future of transportation. By applying behavioral economic theory, policymakers and developers can design transport systems and tools that are not only technologically advanced but also align with consumer preferences and societal acceptance, ultimately fostering sustainable and efficient mobility solutions.
